Emerging markets – decoupled from the crisis?


Frontier Strategy Group built a proprietary model in 2008 to test the assumption that “emerging markets are decoupled from western economies (G7)”. We found that certain markets such as Nigeria and Peru were not only decoupled but provided multinationals with consistently high growth opportunities.  Conversely, growth in markets such as Turkey, were highly dependent on a recovery in western economies.

Surprisingly, in 2011, our model shifted to indicate that emerging markets are no longer thought to be as decoupled as before. Very few markets such as Morocco and Indonesia provide above average growth opportunities with less dependence on the status of western markets.

In 2008 we built a model to understand the global impact of a recession:

2011 data shows markets are more coupled than before

Latin America Insulated from Global Shocks


Debt Crisis in Europe Could Lead to 50% Chance of Recession


DATA: MNC Executive Response to Economic Uncertainty


On August 11, 2011 Frontier Strategy Group surveyed 52 senior executives on the effects of the S&P downgrade and slowdown in the U.S. and Eurozone on their businesses in emerging markets. Participants provided their predictions for what is to come in the midst of the current economic uncertainty. Below is a sample of the responses we received:

Are you prepared for the impact of Friday’s downgrade on your emerging markets business?


Join Frontier Strategy Group to discuss the parallels between volatility in 2008 and 2011. Is history repeating itself? Or is 2011 a second black swan? We will answer these questions and discuss key tactical approaches to protect and grow your emerging markets business during these uncertain times.

Click the following link for teleconference details and to RSVP to this event.

Asia Pacific time zone (Click to download invitation)

US & Europe time zone (Click to download invitation)

 

Impact of US Debt Downgrade on Emerging Markets


Sovereign downgrades typically have two major consequences: first, interest rates increase as investors require additional returns to justify increased risk; second, banks have to raise capital as Tier-1 capital ratios are weakened, slowing lending and the economy. With the United States remaining as the world’s safe haven for capital during crises, these consequences are unlikely to materialize in this case.

Interest rates are unlikely to spike because there is no other low-risk alternative for capital preservation. With Europe’s own sovereign debt crisis turning it into a ‘hot-zone’, and the US economy teetering on the brink of a double-dip recession, capital has nowhere  to turn except US government bonds. Equities are clearly not an option as benchmark indices have plummeted despite cheap valuations. European government debt may not be denominated in Euros by the time it matures. The best performing asset class during the past few weeks has been US Treasuries. The ten-year opened Tuesday at 2.38%, near all-time lows, despite warnings of a downgrade.

US banks, unlike other banks during sovereign debt crises, are not at risk. US banking laws treat US government debt as the safest holding regardless of credit rating so there is no need for banks to raise money to strengthen their capital base. The most imminent risk to US banks is the opaque derivatives trades banks have entered into to speculate on European government debt.

It is also important to acknowledge the political nature of downgrades. S&P’s decision is an effective  commentary on Congress’s mismanagement of spending and broken processes. However, S&P also has an axe to grind as Congress embarrassed the ratings agencies by implicating their behavior as one of the root causes of the global economic downturn.

This downgrade is driven more by the fraught relationship between the US government and S&P, than challenging current economic realities. Real sovereign risk lies in Europe where each round of draconian spending cuts lowers the probability of recovery increasing the risk of a Eurozone default.

Emerging Markets Impact

For emerging markets, after a period of short-term volatility, it will be business as usual. China will complain loudly as the downgrade bolsters its case for more stringent debt management in the United States. These complaints will lack teeth, as China will need to maintain and add to its US Treasury portfolio to protect the asset from painful devaluation. A large sale of US government debt by China would be far more impactful to markets than the revised credit rating from S&P.

Other emerging markets stand to gain from this decision. They will lobby the ratings agencies for higher credit ratings based on improved debt management processes and lower debt ratios. The ratings agencies will have to react in favor of the emerging markets issuers, or risk losing their own credibility. In the years to come, the decision to downgrade the US (and possibly France, Germany, UK, Australia and other debt-laden markets) will benefit emerging markets as higher ratings will result in lower interest rates and more liquidity for them. Having access to capital markets on these terms will be one of the most important steps in graduating emerging markets to emerged markets.